Garsworld's
Stock Market
Stock Market Content Provider

 

Home

About Garsworld

Research Center

Trading Tools

Training Course

Trade Simulator

Affiliate Program

 

 

 

Article Index

 

 

 

Trading vs. Investing

Who's Believable?

Why Trade?

What Bear Market?

What's the Risk?

Nickel & Dime

Trading Axioms

Losses are Wins

The Buy & Hold Myth

Common Stock Scams

What Wall Street Won't Tell You

Guide to Longer-term Trading

Contrarians

 

 

 

Trading versus Investing

The concept of investing is as old as business commerce itself. In the purest form of investment, an investor supplies the capital (money) needed by a business concern, and in return, the business concern grants the investor an ownership stake in the business, or “shares.” Under such an arrangement, both parties are hoping that the business will grow in value. Hence, the investor’s stake grows in value as well.

One form of business investment occurs when a corporation offers a portion of its stock to the public (“IPO,” Initial Public Offering). Such offerings can raise millions – or even billions of dollars of capital for the company. In return, the investors who have purchased the stock each own a piece of the company’s equity.


"The activity of 'trading' is considered politically incorrect by certain portions the mainstream media. Some anti-trading advocates go so far as to imply gambling addiction and other questionable morality associated to 'trading.'"


Stock trading differs from investing when you consider that trading relies more on the fluctuations of the stock value itself. Investing, on the other hand, relies more on the growth of the company who has issued the stock which, in theory, will raise the value of its shares over time.

For instance, let’s say that Joe Investor purchases 1,000 shares of a company’s Initial Public Offering for $10 per share. Joe is thinking that this is an excellent investment since the company is expected to grow by a factor of 20 during the several years. If this pans out, his initial $10,000 investment might be worth at least $200,000.

Now let’s say that the word gets out about this company, its future is looking quite promising, and suddenly everyone wants “in.” Because of the high demand for the stock, its price is driven up to $20 per share, then to $30, then $40, etc. Other investors notice the new “hot” stock issue, and in a mad buying frenzy its price is driven up to $100 within a matter of days.

What just happened? The company hasn’t changed, it hasn’t made one penny, and it hasn’t had a chance to grow. Yet, Joe’s initial $10,000 investment is now worth $100,000! If Joe wanted to, he could sell his shares immediately for a 10-to-1 gain rather than wait for several years to realize his goal of a 20-to-1 gain.

Probably, Joe will sell. In this case, he has made a trade---trading the stock for cash. His profit, while large, did not result from the underlying company’s success, but rather his profit is the result of investor speculation. Additionally, those who bought Joe’s shares could turn around and sell them to someone else, again, as another trade. This is the fundamental difference between investing and trading.

Nonetheless, the terms investing and trading have come to mean the length of time that one intends to hold on to stock. Today, the terms investing and trading are used almost interchangeably---with the distinction of time. One is “investing” if the shareholder intends to hold for a long period of time; one is “trading” if the stock is held for a very short period of time.

This distinction is important to understand more from a philosophical point of view than a technical one. For whatever reason, the activity of “trading” is considered politically incorrect by certain portions the mainstream media. Some anti-trading advocates go so far as to imply gambling addiction and other questionable morality associated to “trading.”

Yet, in today’s market, every stock purchase is, in fact, a trade. Unless one is participating in an Initial Public Offering, not one penny of a stock purchase goes into the company, so one isn’t really investing at all. They are all trades, albeit some of them with longer time horizons than others.



In spite of its apparent social taboo, trading differs from “investing” only in technique. Both the trader and investor share the same goal---to profit on a rising stock.  While convincing arguments can be constructed for both techniques, the point is that “moral” implications about trading should not be a factor and need not be part of the debate, at least not without indicating that "investing" has the same implications but with the intended time horizon as the only technical difference.

Long-term investors are quick to point out that some people have lost fortunes in day-trading and other forms of stock market “gambling,” hence its ill repute. On the other hand, the “investor” is certainly not immune to losing vast sums of money, which by now might be painfully obvious to thousands of speculators who held on to sinking technology issues throughout the year 2000.

“Investors are the real gamblers,” said the legendary 19th Century trader Jesse Livermore. “They make a bet and stick with it, and if it doesn’t go their way they lose everything.”

In truth, successful trading demands a skill, as with any other profession, as special skill that requires precision and concentration, else misfortune. In the hands of a skilled surgeon, a heart transplant goes smoothly. Such surgery, attempted with no education, would be certain death. Stock trading is no exception.

GarsWorld is all about trading, although the technical distinction between trading versus investing is really about time. Considering such a distinction, I must emphasize the following approach to my strategy.

I have no fixed rule about time. I may hold a stock for five minutes or five months, all that matters is that I maximize profit and minimize losses.

It surprises me that the concept of ignoring the time factor is somewhat “new” to many who participate in the stock market. Most investors and the day-traders alike have a very specific idea about time. The investor is often in for the long haul, through thick and thin, come hell or high water, while the day-trader specializes in split-second shaving of fractions from 5-minute trades. I find it interesting that neither of these approaches consider maximizing profit. Instead, they emphasize time as the senior importance to their strategies.

Consider the following strategy as an alternative: Owning a stock as long as it is rising and not own it otherwise. In volatile markets, this will look like day-trading. In steadier bull markets it will look like investing.

The guiding principle should be maximizing one's profit!